“Discuss ‘A house for Mr. Biswas’ by v.s.naipaul as one of the twentieth Century’s finest novels.”

Name                             :         Bhaliya Uma H.

Roll No                          :         01.

SEM                               :         04. M.A. part -2.

Paper No                        :         E-C-401.

Paper Name                   :         New Literature.

Date                               :         26/03/2012.

Topic Name                   :         Assignment on.

“Discuss ‘A house for Mr.   Biswas’ by v.s.naipaul as one of the twentieth

Century’s finest novels.”

Dept                               :         Department of English.

Submitted To                 :         Dr. Dilip Sir Barad.

                                                Department of English.

                                                Bhavnagar University Bhavnagar.

v Discuss ‘A house for mr. biswas’by v.s.naipaul as one of the twentieth century’s finest novels.

‘A house for mr. biswas’ is a finest work of v.s.naipaul. this novel is very comic and lighter in tone. And this novel for the complexity of a house for mr biswas is its narrative point of view. A house for mr. biswas is an unforgettable story inspired by naipaul’s father that has been hailed as one of the twentieth century’s finest novels. In this novel mr. mohun biswas has been fighting against destiny to achieve some semblance of independence, only to face a lifetime of calamity. ‘A house for mr.biswas by v.s.naipaul’s masterpiece. Vidiadhar Surajprasad Naipaul was born in 1932 at Chaguanas in central Trinidad. This dissolution is described also in A House for Mr Biswas through the Tulsi family. Naipaul’s father was a journalist; he felt very close to him, though he described him as a ‘defeated man’, and he is the prototype for Mr Biswas. Like Anand, the son of Mr Biswas. He was in England  when his father died. ‘A house for mr. biswas.’

A House for Mr. Biswas is the story about a Trinidad native of Indian ancestry. In this novel is approximately the forty-six years of mr. biswas’s life between about 1905 and 1951. And Mohun Biswas is nominally Hindu, and he questions much of traditional Hindu Indian culture. but The novel has been called tragicomic. So through this novel ‘A house for mr. biswas v.s.naipaul’s present reality of mr biswas own frustration and an unforgettable story and one of the twentieth century’s finest novels.

A house for mr.biswas is written in third person past of view of an omniscient third party narrator. The point of view style relatively close to mr.biswas, the protagonist. The novel is divided into two parts, enclosed by a Prologue and an Epilogue. The doll’s house did not exist.

A House for Mr Biswas is much humor novel and also tragedy. And also that the dominant tone of the novel is melodramatic. In this novel, The novel presents the struggle for identity for an Indian in Trinidad whose agrarian values are challenged by Western cultural influences when he moves to the city. And Mohun Biswas must reconcile the apparently contradictory values and traditions of East and West, and forge an authentic self in relation to both family and society. So that are the social concerns themes of a house for mr biswas. But A House for Mr Biswas Techniques and Literary Precedents present Two radically different novelistic traditions have influenced A House for Mr Biswas: the twentith-century English social novel, with its focus on an individual life story amid a large cast of characters, and the existential novels of Camus, particularly The Stranger. In this novel Naipaul present Indian in Trinidad, and a dispossessed colonial in England, experienced a similar difficulty charting a life among traditions that seem alien to him. In this novel monun to build a home that challenges his life's absurdity. An underlying theme in A House for Mr. Biswas, and in Naipaul's early work in general, is anti-colonialism. This novel is best work of him.

The character of Mr Biswas

Mr Biswas himself is not all that he appears to be. Mr Biswas replies: ‘I am just somebody. ‘A House for Mr Biswas is a novel about the relationship between father and son’.

 A House for Mr Biswas can be described as a novel about the father-son relationship, and it is concerned with other themes also, such as Mr Biswas’s struggle for independence and his search for identity. The relationship between father and son is intensified by the many traits they have in common. Mr Biswas shares his discovery of Dickens’s novels with Anand and makes him write out and learn the meanings of difficult words. The closeness between father and son is revealed in several episodes. A striking example occurs after Anand nearly drowns at the dockside where Mr Biswas was clowning with Owad and Shekhar and trying to get his son to join in. Anand then goes back on his promise to return home, and is still in England when his father dies. It is clear that A House for Mr Biswas is, to a large extent, a novel about the relationship between father and son, and the growing closeness and identification between them adds greatly to the richness and psychological realism of the novel.

“Tess of the D’Urbervilles: A Pure Woman” Novel by Thomas Hardy.

Name                             :         Bhaliya Uma H.

Roll No                          :         01.

SEM                               :         04. M.A. part -2.

Paper No                        :         E-C-405-A.

Paper Name                             :         A study of special Author:

                                                Thomas Hardy as a novelist.

Date                               :         26/03/2012.

Topic Name                             :         Assignment on.

“Tess of the D’Urbervilles: A Pure Woman Novel by Thomas Hardy.”

Dept                               :         Department of English.

Submitted To                 :         Dr. Dilip Sir Barad.

                                                Department of English.

                                                Bhavnagar University Bhavnagar.

v “Tess of the D’Urbervilles: A Pure Woman” Novel by Thomas Hardy.

Thomas Hardy Novel “Tess of the D’Urbervilles” is first published in 1891. In this novel is a story of sexual seduction though anyone who goes to it in the hope of finding pornography is going to be sadly disappointed. Hardy was certainly being provocative when he added the subtitle ‘A pure Woman’.
 Ø Novels: “Tess of the d’urbervilles.”

Tess of the d’Urbervilles is a Novel about Tess from the time she is sixteen or seventeen to the Age of about twenty-one. Using what has been termed an epic. Form, Herdy has described her life during this period. We are told of her actions, her Justifications for them, her trials and tribulations, and efforts to overcome the circumstantial will Against Enjoyment. Other characters must, of course, come into the story, but only what is important to Tess is told us. There are no subplots which interweave with the main story: only Tess’s story is important. She as a human being is explored thoroughly, both emotionally and intellectually. Those events which have significance in her life are examined carefully. The Novel is divided into seven phases. At the end of each a fateful incident has changed Tess’s life. She begins each phase of her life with an altered view of herself and her destiny. At last in this Novel. Hardy’s [resent real tragedy of Tess and her Great suffer in this Novel.
Ø Content of the Novel.

Tess parents John and Joan Durbeyfield is a poor and ignorant couple. Dyrbeyfield is a farm worker. Yet he knows that he is a direct descendant of the formerly powerful d’Urbervilles family. Tess leaves home, goes to work for a remote relation, Mrs. D’ urberville’s son Alec, whom she hates and despises. To escape his Attentions she returns home and gives parents accept the situation with little complaint, and the baby is adored by Tess’ little brother and sister. Soon however the child falls ill. Tess wishes to have it baptized but when the vicar calls at the cottage her father, in a moment of drunken obstinacy, refuses to Admit so Tess decides that she herself will baptize the brother and sisters who all share the same room In the Durbeyfield cottage.

After the baby’s death Tess, hoping to escape from the memory of her troubles, goes to work at a farm called Talbot hays. A young man called Angel Clare, with whom she falls in love. Clare is the son of an evangelical clergy man and, by the conventions of the time much above to her social position. He has not followed his father and two elder brothers into the ministry because he can not accept orthodox Christian. Beliefs. Nevertheless his ideas on morality are highly convehtial. He is working as a pupil on the Tallbothays farm and intends eventually to buy a farm of his own possibly abroad.

Tess begins to love by keeping Angel at a distance, though she knows he returns her love and in spite of her Admiration and respect for him. When he proposes marriage she at first refuses, feeling that her past misadventure though no fault of her own makes her unworthy of him. Angel’s persuasion and her great love for him eventually break her resistance and she Agrees to marry him. Before the wedding, she tries on several occasion to tell him of her past ‘sin’ but each time she is prevented, either by some trivial circumstance or by A failure of courage. Sometime before the wedding Tess Writes A confession and explanation, seals it in an envelope, and pushes it under the door of Angel’s room. When they meet next day his Attitude is unchanged and Tess conduces that he has read the letter, still loves her and intend s never to mention the matter she has revealed to him. In fact, Angel has never received the letter, which had lodged under the carpet of his room.

Tess discovers this only an hour or two before the wedding and is too over. Mad with Grief and Anxiety to mention it until they have started their honeymoon, which is spent in an Ancient mill house, here, the evening of the wedding day Tess summons up enough courage to reveals the secret of her husband. She tells him the story as they are sitting together in the Ancient Parlors of the mill house, illuminated only by the flames of a wood fire Angel is at first incredulous, then profoundly shocked that the Apparently pure girl he married is not in fact A virgin. Tess is also shocked, but for a different reason. She simply cannot believe that Angel’s love for her, and her own devotion to him, could be married or destroyed by a past event in which she has been no more than an innocent victim. The first few nights of their married life are spent in separate rooms and Angel than announces that they must part, at least for a time. So that he can think thing over. He plans to go to Brazil for A year or two with the idea of studying form conditions there. Tess is to stay at home either in loadings or back in her parent’s cottage. Her material needs are husband leaves her or in any imagery, by help from his father the vicar.

Desert by the husband whom she still loves with her whole heart, and too proud to apply for help either to his parents or her own. Tess returns to work on land. Many months pass and Clare does not write. Tess own imploring letters are ignored and gradually she becomes convinced that she will never see her husband Again. At this point she once Again meets her seducer Alec d’ urbervilles. Somewhat surprising he has been converted and has become a preacher, but seeing Tess Again revives his passion for her.

A mixture of passion and genuine regret for the suffering he has caused her in the past prompts him to pursue her relentlessly and at last wearied by his importunity, moved by consideration for her now widowed mother and her young brothers and sisters to whom d’Urbervilles offers a home and security. Tess gives way. Convinced by now that her husband will never return. In fact however Angel Clare is Already on his way back from Brazil, broken in health and spirit by the tough conditions he has encountered there and now convinced that he loves the wife he has treated so harshly.

On Arriving in Wessex Clare finds it impossible at first to find out what has happened to his wife. At last his enquires lead him to A hotel where she is staying with d’Urbervilles. They face each other in dining – room, and each is horrified Clare because it seens, that his own foolish behavior has driven his wife permanently into the Arms of another man, Tess because the husband she loved and waited for and finally given up for dead has returned. Worn out, ill and needing her help she realizes that she leaves him more than life and hates the man still asleep upstairs, who has tricked her into betraying her husband. The moment Angel has left her Tess seizes a carving knife from the waiting breakfast tray, kills the still sleeping d’Urbervilles and runs desperately away from the hotel and after her husband.

At last they are reunited and re conceited, but each knows it can only be a matter of hours before Alec’s body is discovered and only a day or two before Tess is hunted down and arrested. They make for the country of north Wessex and hide for six days and six nights in a deserted mansion where they are discovered, Asleep in each other’s Arms by the old care taker. Before she can rouse the neighbors’, the fugitive their flight across country. They reach Stonehenge and here Tess is over the Great plain and gilds the grim monoliths in whose shelter the innocent murderess lies asleep, the police at Last Arrive.

That Hardy should be called a pessimistic is not surprising to anyone who reads this magnificently tragic novel but a tragic Attitude is not necessarily a gloomy one and there is much in ‘Tess…’ that is far from gloomy, especially the essential beauty and goodness of Tess’ own character. Angel Clare is a typically tragic character in the Aristotelian sense- likeable, honest, Affectionate and intelligent: yet showing curious moral blindness which is the real cause of Tess’ and his own suffering.

If he had been able to rid himself of the ingrown and distorted notions of purity which he had been brought up with there would have been no suffering, but he had cast away Christian belief while unconsciously retaining mistaken ideas of Christian morality.